Athens, Kerameikos Museum. Two proto-geometric amphoras with belly handles, datable not far from 1,000 BCE. |
After a generation that was impoverished, when the pots were poorly made but continuous in fabric and many elements of form from the end of Mycenaean, we now see well prepared clay, deliberately designed and proportioned pots, purposeful change—very evident pride in what they were doing. They not only get a passing grade in Basic Design, they have invented it, as the West ever since has understood it. These amphoras are still less than a meter tall, but in an age that did not yet use drafted stone or carve limestone or marble or use bronze for things larger than the long pins that were worn in the shoulders of a peplos, they held the ashes and bone fragments of the deceased. For the moment, ceramics engaged the most esteemed craftsmen. I omitted armor, because we know of very little datable this early, and votive vessels for the same reason; even the plain ones that I know of are later. There was no money as such, and it would be a century before they had adapted the alphabet that we know from Aramaean monuments. The Late Mycenaean foundation settlements on the west coast of Asia Minor did, of course, trade with other Greeks, but during recovery from the collapse of the 12th century, trade seems to have been a luxury for all. Here, though, we see Athens, at least, emerging from hand-to-mouth survival. Athens had had, of course, a Mycenaean palace on the Acropolis and kings and therefore (besides that boast about the Dorians) something to be proud of, and good land, too. This mere paragraph should tempt the reader to get a good history, if he hasn't done so before.
The pair of amphoras we begin with not only have structural clarity, but (plain as they may seem) characteristic innovations. Where sub-Mycenaean decorators drew freehand messy half-circles, these have managed to invent a compass that lets them draw perfectly even complete circles; it may even be a comb compass. Then someone discovers that if you paint the ground around the half-circles on the shoulder with glaze-paint (which occasionally, even on large pots, they manage to fire evenly and black), you have in effect light half-circles where you'd drawn them dark. And, though very soon, they will sometimes put plus-designs in the center of concentric circles, they quite evidently do not mean wheels, especially not at first, and certainly nothing like banal symbols, stars or suns. They are done per se. Everything points the way to all of Greek art, where technique and pleasure in form underlie all else.
By the 9th century, as we calculate, the ornament that is the mark of fully Geometric decoration, the hatched maeander, is often joined for a generation or so by the expansion of the dark grounds to make the vases predominantly black, and the circles often, but not always, disappear. Also the necks are taller and straighter, the bodies taller and more ovoid. The strap handle to the neck, also, used this way,becomes commoner.
The pair of amphoras we begin with not only have structural clarity, but (plain as they may seem) characteristic innovations. Where sub-Mycenaean decorators drew freehand messy half-circles, these have managed to invent a compass that lets them draw perfectly even complete circles; it may even be a comb compass. Then someone discovers that if you paint the ground around the half-circles on the shoulder with glaze-paint (which occasionally, even on large pots, they manage to fire evenly and black), you have in effect light half-circles where you'd drawn them dark. And, though very soon, they will sometimes put plus-designs in the center of concentric circles, they quite evidently do not mean wheels, especially not at first, and certainly nothing like banal symbols, stars or suns. They are done per se. Everything points the way to all of Greek art, where technique and pleasure in form underlie all else.
Athens, Kerameikos Museum. Two Middle Geometric neck-handled amphoras |
A 1959 snapshot to emphasize the size of the Great Dipylon Amphora
(and its less well preserved twin) |
The prothesis in the handle zone of the Great Dipylon Amphora. |
The other Great Dipylon Amphora, a bit later, and showing the next stage of the funeral, the ekphora, transporting the corpse to the cemetery |
Sometimes, too (already in the 9th century with the granary and the granulated gold dangle earrings from the tomb of a wealthy woman in the Agora, illustrated in Boardman) we have found tomb groups of vases that are hard to look at otherwise than whimsically:
Berlin, St. Museen, Tomb group of fancy vases. Beautifully fired black glaze-paint (but also waxed to shine). The hanging vases are in the shape of a basket and an ostrich egg. |
Basic book:
John Boardman, Early Greek Vase Painting. World of Art, 1998. It is richly provided not only with annotated illustrations and excellent, essential chapters, but with charts, maps, notes, and bibliographies in the back. There are translations, if needed, in half a dozen other languages.
In the next post I'll look at some less familiar pieces.
I've decided that pots are not exactly opera nobilia. They aren't studied the same way, and they're all originals, and they are much more varied.
John Boardman, Early Greek Vase Painting. World of Art, 1998. It is richly provided not only with annotated illustrations and excellent, essential chapters, but with charts, maps, notes, and bibliographies in the back. There are translations, if needed, in half a dozen other languages.
In the next post I'll look at some less familiar pieces.
I've decided that pots are not exactly opera nobilia. They aren't studied the same way, and they're all originals, and they are much more varied.
Quite late to the table here, but in reading this series, I am glad to be reminded of Gombrich's book, of which I have a copy, and which I'm not sure I finished reading years ago, so am rereading now. In any case, I will get more from it now than then.
ReplyDeletePerhaps the answer is obvious (it isn't to me), but how were the horizontal patterns painted so perfectly? I imagine the meanders and v-shapes were plotted out width-wise after measuring the circumference of the area at which they were to be painted, but how were the plain lines kept perfectly level? I picture a brush somehow kept stable and the pot rotated on a turntable; however, given the skill necessary to paint repeating human figures that are so consistent (yet unique), perhaps the most skilled were able to paint them freehand along a plotted-out guideline?
Yes, even in the Mycenaean pottery, when they had no compass drawn half circles, as soon as pots were wheel made (by c. 2000 almost everywhere in the Mediterranean world) they were re-centered on the wheel and a judiciously loaded brush applied to the slowly spinning pot. It probably helped that a boy or man turned the wheel--so that the potter didn't have to kick to turn it. When a pot is well made, even a huge one made in pieces, then assembled, the horizontal banding is perfect. Wet clay can hold damp, 'leather-hard' clay very well. Handles were attached with clay slurry, the points of attachment having been scored, and the joint of a big neck to a big body (as on the Dipylon amphoras) was done the same way, likewise feet attached to the bottom of the bowl of kylixes. Very often, even when pots are found broken, the joins remain intact. Yes, the skill of all the freehand work is awe-inspiring. The big puzzle remains the drawing with some sort of compass of the concentric half circles and circles on the double-curved surface of the pot, keeping the width of the lines the same.
ReplyDeleteOf course, the potter's wheel. I don't tend to "think in ceramics," as my own ventures into the medium only got so far as hand-building with slabs and coils and by pinching. I'm also familiar, by observing while modeling for figure sculptors, with the addition of appendages by scoring and applying slurry. However, I have no experience with the wheel, or firing, or glaze-painting, so I still count myself among the ignorant as far as pottery techniques go.
ReplyDelete